The lawyers are probably correct. Your client needs to share a copy with you.

Yes.  Now permission is granted in our finance addendum.

Melissa,
In Colorado and Texas the title company handles the closing. No attorneys’ involved except to prepare the docs. We are still seeing both sides.

I would be wary of relying on boilerplate language in a form contract to disclose the information on the new Buyer Closing Disclosure to a seller and real estate agent.  In addition to the buyer CD and seller CD, we use an ALTA Settlement Statement to give to the realtors.

By the end of closing  I have, but not before ?

Yes I have.

No experience yet with a TRID transaction, but in favor of full disclosure.

Yes.

The only reason a Buyer would care about the Seller side statement is so the Buyer Agent can decide whether or not to grumble about the co-broke!

Melissa Polce - I have seen the closing disclosure - and it covers both the sides to best of my knowledge.

Permission? If we get it from our clients, yes.

Yes, in fact some of the closers are sharing it all (with permission of course).

The lender said I was unable to view my buyer's CD, which made it difficult, as they could not explain.   Most lenders are saying this is personal.

I don't recall seeing one on my last sale, but the seller had no need to.  From a privacy professional perspective, I would say that these are confidential to the buyer and should only be shared at their discretion.

Nope, can only see the one applying to my clients. Also, they are now not allowing them to hear one anothers numbers, or at least that was the case last week.

I don't ask!

I've seen both sides on the one we had so far.

In south, south jersey attorneys aren't used just title 

We do not have TRID in Canada.

I haven't paid much attention as long as my clients numbers are correct I don't pay attention the to the other sides closing.