Both

I typically use drone video over stills.

But if I have a a beach front or golf course property (or only land) I'd use both. The listing location determines it more than my preferences.

Both. Depending on what kind of property, an informational video with stills and slides, something that shows the property off or with my big land parcels just aerial flyovers with music.

Both

I use both, depending on what kind of property it is... I always use a professioonal photographer and vitual tours... but will do aerial views if the house and location warrant it.  

Depends on the property and where I'm marketing

Both. While you are up there why not get both done?

usually just photography...but we have used both if the property is of a certain magnitude....

Most of the photos we use are GIS grade aerial photography flown by various govt agencies.

Depends on the property. Some of the properties need a drone video to show the entire property in a flowing manner. Some properties, will do better with stills because you may not want to flaunt the power lines nearby:) etc. :) 

I would want both.  

Both

Both

I get professional photography, and aerials if the property has views or open spaces.   I create a video from the photos.

Depends on the property in question.  My primary focus is stills followed by a video.

I don't personally use either but video sure seems to be the way to go.

I use photography 

Both are a better option, Tony and Suzanne Marriott, Associate Brokers 

Both - definitely!

I would have to say both.

I have not done aerial yet

Not using either but would like both

It depends on the footage and stills. I would like both.

I have not used aerial photography.

I have no preference... don't use it often enough.